Biological Science Guidelines

Feng, X., Park, D. S., Walker, C., Peterson, A. T., Merow, C., & Papeş, M. (2019). A checklist for maximizing reproducibility of ecological niche models. Nature Ecology & Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0972-5
Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., … Dirnagl, U. (2019). The Hong Kong Principles for Assessing Researchers: Fostering Research Integrity (preprint). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/m9abx
Bøtker, H. E., Hausenloy, D., Andreadou, I., Antonucci, S., Boengler, K., Davidson, S. M., … Heusch, G. (2018). Practical guidelines for rigor and reproducibility in preclinical and clinical studies on cardioprotection. Basic Research in Cardiology, 113(5), 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-018-0696-8
Oakden-Rayner, L., Beam, A. L., & Palmer, L. J. (2018). Medical journals should embrace preprints to address the reproducibility crisis. International Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy105
Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823
Toelch, U., & Ostwald, D. (2018). Digital open science—Teaching digital tools for reproducible and transparent research. PLOS Biology, 16(7), e2006022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2006022
Granell, C., Hofer, B., Konkol, M., Ostermann, F., Sileryte, R., & Cerutti, V. (2018). Reproducible research and GIScience: an Evaluation using AGILE conference papers, (November 2017), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26561v1
Gilmore, R. O., Diaz, M. T., Wyble, B. A., & Yarkoni, T. (2017). Progress toward openness, transparency, and reproducibility in cognitive neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1396(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13325
Ihle, M., Winney, I. S., Krystalli, A., & Croucher, M. (2017). Striving for transparent and credible research: Practical guidelines for behavioral ecologists. Behavioral Ecology, 28(2), 348–354. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arx003
Flier, J. S. (2017). Irreproducibility of published bioscience research: Diagnosis, pathogenesis and therapy (Vol. 6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2016.11.006
Bernard, C. (2017). Editorial: Code Case - Investigating Transparency and Reproducibility. ENeuro, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0233-17.2017
McIntosh, L. D., Juehne, A., Vitale, C. R. H., Liu, X., Alcoser, R., Lukas, J. C., & Evanoff, B. (2017). Repeat: A framework to assess empirical reproducibility in biomedical research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0377-6
Denaxas, S., Direk, K., Gonzalez-Izquierdo, A., Pikoula, M., Cakiroglu, A., Moore, J., … Smeeth, L. (2017). Methods for enhancing the reproducibility of biomedical research findings using electronic health records. BioData Mining, 10(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-017-0151-7
Finkelstein, B., Silberberg, S., & Crawford, D. (2017). Improving preclinical research through rigorous study design and transparent reporting. In MEETING OF THE COUNCIL ON GOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.cogr.edu/sites/default/files/Finkelstein rigor.pdf
Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). Rigorous science: A how-to guide. MBio, 7(6), e01902–16. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01902-16
Snyder, H. M., Shineman, D. W., Friedman, L. G., Hendrix, J. A., Khachaturian, A., Le Guillou, I., … Ridley, S. H. (2016). Guidelines to improve animal study design and reproducibility for Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias: For funders and researchers. Alzheimer’s and Dementia, 12(11), 1177–1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2016.07.001
Weissgerber, T. L., Garovic, V. D., Winham, S. J., Milic, N. M., & Prager, E. M. (2016). Transparent reporting for reproducible science. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 94(10), 859–864. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23785
Drucker, D. J. (2016). Never Waste a Good Crisis: Confronting Reproducibility in Translational Research (Vol. 24). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.006
Lakens, D., Hilgard, J., & Staaks, J. (2016). On the reproducibility of meta-analyses: six practical recommendations. BMC Psychology, 4(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0126-3
Daugherty, A., Hegele, R. A., Mackman, N., Rader, D. J., Schmidt, A. M., & Weber, C. (2016). Complying with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines and Principles for Rigor and Reproducibility: Refutations. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 36(7), 1303–1304. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.307906
Sahoo, S. S., Valdez, J., & Rueschman, M. (2016). Scientific Reproducibility in Biomedical Research: Provenance Metadata Ontology for Semantic Annotation of Study Description. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2016, 1070. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28269904 http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC5333253 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333253/
Waltemath, D., & Wolkenhauer, O. (2016). How Modeling Standards, Software, and Initiatives Support Reproducibility in Systems Biology and Systems Medicine. IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering, 63(10), 1999–2006. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2016.2555481
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. (2016). Enhancing Research Reproducibility: Recommendations from the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 4(2), 12. Retrieved from http://www.faseb.org/Portals/2/PDFs/opa/2016/FASEB_Enhancing Research Reproducibility.pdf
Gorgolewski, K. J., & Poldrack, R. A. (2016). A Practical Guide for Improving Transparency and Reproducibility in Neuroimaging Research. PLoS Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002506
Frye, S. V., Arkin, M. R., Arrowsmith, C. H., Conn, P. J., Glicksman, M. A., Hull-Ryde, E. A., & Slusher, B. S. (2015). Tackling reproducibility in academic preclinical drug discovery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4737
Freedman, L. P., Cockburn, I. M., & Simcoe, T. S. (2015). The economics of reproducibility in preclinical research. PLoS Biology, 13(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002165
The Academy of Medical Sciences. (2015). Reproducibility and reliability of biomedical research: improving research practice. Symposium Report, (October). Retrieved from https://acmedsci.ac.uk/viewFile/56314e40aac61.pdf
Society, T. B., & Materials, D. (2015). Guidelines for the Reproducibility of Biophysics Research, (July), 1–4. Retrieved from http://www.cell.com/pb/assets/raw/journals/society/biophysj/PDFs/reproducibility-guidelines.pdf
Glasziou, P., Altman, D. G., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Clarke, M., Julious, S., … Wager, E. (2014). Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. The Lancet, 383(9913), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-X
Chan, A. W., Song, F., Vickers, A., Jefferson, T., Dickersin, K., Gøtzsche, P. C., … Van Der Worp, H. B. (2014). Increasing value and reducing waste: Addressing inaccessible research. The Lancet, 383(9913), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62296-5
Chalmers, I., Bracken, M. B., Djulbegovic, B., Garattini, S., Grant, J., Gülmezoglu, A. M., … Oliver, S. (2014). How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. The Lancet, 383(9912), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1
Winey, M., Bertuzzi, S., Greider, C., Koshland, D., Lee, C., Mungai, P., & Nosek, B. (2014). How can scientists enhance rigor in conducting basic research and reporting research results? A White Paper from the American Society for Cell Biology. Retrieved from https://www.ascb.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/How-can-scientist-enhance-rigor.pdf http://www.ascb.org/reproducibility/
Macleod, M. R., Michie, S., Roberts, I., Dirnagl, U., Chalmers, I., Ioannidis, J. P. A., … Glasziou, P. (2014). Biomedical research: Increasing value, reducing waste. The Lancet, 383(9912), 101–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62329-6
Name, C. A., Number, M., & Life, R. (2013). Reporting Checklist For Life Sciences Articles. Nature, 2013(May), 5–6. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.750df
Fallis, A. . (2013). Best Practices in Data Analysis and Sharing in Neuroimaging using MRI. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Steward, O., Popovich, P. G., Dietrich, W. D., & Kleitman, N. (2012). Replication and reproducibility in spinal cord injury research. Experimental Neurology, 233(2), 597–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.06.017
Begley, C. G., & Ellis, L. M. (2012). Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature, 483(7391), 531–533. https://doi.org/10.1038/483531a
Shineman, D. W., Basi, G. S., Bizon, J. L., Colton, C. A., Greenberg, B. D., Hollister, B. A., … Fillit, H. M. (2011). Accelerating drug discovery for Alzheimer’s disease: best practices for preclinical animal studies. Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy, 3(5), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/alzrt90
Kunlashiro, F. (2011). Revisiting the scientific method to improve rigor and reproducibility of immunohistochemistry in reproductive science Sharrón, (April 2018), 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioy094/4980903
Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2010). Reproducible science (Vol. 78). American Society for Microbiology (ASM). https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00908-10
Ludolph, A. C., Bendotti, C., Blaugrund, E., Chio, A., Greensmith, L., Loeffler, J.-P., … von Horsten, S. (2010). Guidelines for preclinical animal research in ALS/MND: A consensus meeting. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis : Official Publication of the World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases, 11(1–2), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.3109/17482960903545334
Fisher, M., Feuerstein, G., Howells, D. W., Hurn, P. D., Kent, T. A., Savitz, S. I., & Lo, E. H. (2009). Update of the stroke therapy academic industry roundtable preclinical recommendations. Stroke, 40(6), 2244–2250. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.541128
Avenue, G. (1999). Recommendations for standards regarding preclinical neuroprotective and restorative drug development. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 30(12), 2752–2758. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.12.2752
Society for Neuroscience. (n.d.). Research Practices for Scientific Rigor: A Resource for Discussion , Training , and Practice.