Library Science Examples

Sayre, F., & Riegelman, A. (2019). Replicable Services for Reproducible Research: A Model for Academic Libraries. College & Research Libraries, 80(2), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.2.260
Lubke, J., Paulus, T. M., Britt, V. G., & Atkins, D. P. (2017). Hacking the Literature Review: Opportunities and Innovations to Improve the Research Process. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 56(4), 285. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.56.4.285
Johnson, R. P. (2017). Consume, Reproduce, Extend and Connect: Sustaining Our Research Lifecycle. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 43(4), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/bul2.2017.1720430407
Page, M. J., Altman, D. G., Shamseer, L., McKenzie, J. E., Ahmadzai, N., Wolfe, D., … Moher, D. (2017). Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.017
Arguello, J., Crane, M., Diaz, F., Lin, J., & Trotman, A. (2016). Report on the SIGIR 2015 Workshop on Reproducibility, Inexplicability, and Generalizability of Results (RIGOR). SIGIR Forum, 49(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1145/2888422.2888439
Koffel, J. B., & Rethlefsen, M. L. (2016). Reproducibility of search strategies is poor in systematic reviews published in high-impact pediatrics, cardiology and surgery journals: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 11(9), e0163309. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163309
Page, M. J., Shamseer, L., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Sampson, M., Tricco, A. C., … Moher, D. (2016). Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLOS Medicine, 13(5), e1002028. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002028
Koffel, J. B. (2015). Use of Recommended Search Strategies in Systematic Reviews and the Impact of Librarian Involvement: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Recent Authors. PLOS ONE, 10(5), e0125931. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125931
Vitale, C. R. H. (2015). Is Research Reproducibility the New Data Management for Libraries? Bulletin of Association for Information Science and Technology, 42(3), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/bul2.2016.1720420313