Library Science Examples

Sayre, F., & Riegelman, A. (2019). Replicable Services for Reproducible Research: A Model for Academic Libraries. College & Research Libraries, 80(2), 260–272.
Lubke, J., Paulus, T. M., Britt, V. G., & Atkins, D. P. (2017). Hacking the Literature Review: Opportunities and Innovations to Improve the Research Process. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 56(4), 285.
Johnson, R. P. (2017). Consume, Reproduce, Extend and Connect: Sustaining Our Research Lifecycle. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 43(4), 24–29.
Page, M. J., Altman, D. G., Shamseer, L., McKenzie, J. E., Ahmadzai, N., Wolfe, D., Yazdi, F., Catalá-López, F., Tricco, A. C., & Moher, D. (2017). Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
Arguello, J., Crane, M., Diaz, F., Lin, J., & Trotman, A. (2016). Report on the SIGIR 2015 Workshop on Reproducibility, Inexplicability, and Generalizability of Results (RIGOR). SIGIR Forum, 49(2), 107–116.
Koffel, J. B., & Rethlefsen, M. L. (2016). Reproducibility of search strategies is poor in systematic reviews published in high-impact pediatrics, cardiology and surgery journals: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 11(9), e0163309.
Page, M. J., Shamseer, L., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Sampson, M., Tricco, A. C., Catalá-López, F., Li, L., Reid, E. K., Sarkis-Onofre, R., & Moher, D. (2016). Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLOS Medicine, 13(5), e1002028.
Koffel, J. B. (2015). Use of Recommended Search Strategies in Systematic Reviews and the Impact of Librarian Involvement: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Recent Authors. PLOS ONE, 10(5), e0125931.
Vitale, C. R. H. (2015). Is Research Reproducibility the New Data Management for Libraries? Bulletin of Association for Information Science and Technology, 42(3), 38–41.