Social Science Examples

Chin, J., & Zeiler, K. (2021). Replicability in Empirical Legal Research [Preprint]. LawArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/2b5k4
Klapwijk, E. T., van den Bos, W., Tamnes, C. K., Raschle, N. M., & Mills, K. L. (2021). Opportunities for increased reproducibility and replicability of developmental neuroimaging. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 47, 100902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100902
Janz, N., & Freese, J. (2020). Replicate Others as You Would Like to Be Replicated Yourself. PS: Political Science & Politics, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000943
Smith, L. M., Yu, F., & Schmid, K. (2020). Role of Replication Research in Biostatistics Graduate Education. Journal of Statistics Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1844105
Kedron, P., Li, W., Fotheringham, S., & Goodchild, M. (2020). Reproducibility and replicability: opportunities and challenges for geospatial research. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2020.1802032
Minocher, R., Atmaca, S., Bavero, C., McElreath, R., & Beheim, B. (2020). Reproducibility of social learning research declines exponentially over 63 years of publication [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4nzc7
Marks-Anglin, A., & Chen, Y. (2020). A Historical Review of Publication Bias [Preprint]. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/zmdpk
Ruggeri, K., Linden, S. van der, Papa, F., & Green, J. (2020). Standards for evidence in policy decision-making [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fjwvk
Bergh, D. D., & Oswald, F. L. (2020). Fostering Robust, Reliable, and Replicable Research at the Journal of Management. Journal of Management, 014920632091772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320917729
Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (2020). Meta Research: Replication of Significant Results --- Modeling the Effects of p-Hacking [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tu7zr
Hail, L., Lang, M., & Leuz, C. (2020). Reproducibility in Accounting Research: Views of the Research Community. Journal of Accounting Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12305
Larson, M. J. (2020). Improving the Rigor and Replicability of Applied Psychophysiology Research: Sample Size, Standardization, Transparency, and Preregistration. Biofeedback, 48(1), 2–6. https://doi.org/10.5298/1081-5937-48.1.2
Gilmore, R. O., Cole, P. M., Verma, S., Aken, M. A. G., & Worthman, C. M. (2020). Advancing Scientific Integrity, Transparency, and Openness in Child Development Research: Challenges and Possible Solutions. Child Development Perspectives, 14(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12360
Hardwicke, T. E., Wallach, J. D., Kidwell, M. C., Bendixen, T., Crüwell, S., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2020). An empirical assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in the social sciences (2014–2017). Royal Society Open Science, 7(2), 190806. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190806
Bienefeld, M., Böhm-Kasper, O., & Demmer, C. (2020). Highly recommended and yet neglected. The rarity of replication studies in educational science. Journal for Educational Research Online, 12(3), 3–22. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-211840
Marone, L., Lopez de Casenave, J., & González del Solar, R. (2019). Mario Bunge’s systemic thesis of truth: implications for research practice and the “reproducibility crisis.” Humanities Journal of Valparaiso, 14, 363. https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2019iss14pp363-376
Vijayakumar, R., & Cheung, M. W.-L. (2019). Assessing Replicability of Machine Learning Results: An Introduction to Methods on Predictive Accuracy in Social Sciences. Social Science Computer Review, 089443931988844. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319888445
Bryan, C. J., Yeager, D. S., & O’Brien, J. M. (2019). Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201910951. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910951116
Isaacowitz, D. M. (2019). OPEN SCIENCE IN GERONTOLOGY: IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLISHING. Innovation in Aging, 3(Supplement_1), S399–S400. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.1480
Damian, E., Meuleman, B., & van Oorschot, W. (2019). Transparency and Replication in Cross-national Survey Research: Identification of Problems and Possible Solutions. Sociological Methods & Research, 004912411988245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119882452
Wolf, L. J., Rey, S. J., & Oshan, T. M. (2019). Open Code is not enough: Towards a replicable future for geographic data science [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/3hbnt
Gennetian, L. A., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Frank, M. C. (2019). Advancing Transparency and Openness in Child Development Research: Opportunities [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wbv2d
Roettger, T. B. (2019). Preregistration in linguistic research: Applications, challenges, and limitations [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vc9hu
Kedron, P., Frazier, A. E., Trgovac, A. B., Nelson, T., & Fotheringham, A. S. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Geographical Analysis. Geographical Analysis, gean.12221. https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12221
Ziółkowski, A. (2019). The Stability of Philosophical Intuitions: Failed Replications of Swain et al. (2008). Episteme, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2019.20
Crüwell, S., Stefan, A. M., & Evans, N. J. (2019). Robust Standards in Cognitive Science. Computational Brain & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-019-00049-8
Grahe, J. E., Cuccolo, K., Leighton, D. C., & Cramblet Alvarez, L. D. (2019). Open Science Promotes Diverse, Just, and Sustainable Research and Educational Outcomes. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 147572571986916. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719869164
Hao, Q., Smith IV, D. H., Iriumi, N., Tsikerdekis, M., & Ko, A. J. (2019). A Systematic Investigation of Replications in Computing Education Research. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 19(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3345328
Stojmenovska, D., Bol, T., & Leopold, T. (2019). Teaching Replication to Graduate Students. Teaching Sociology, 0092055X1986799. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X19867996
Isaacowitz, D. M., & Lind, M. (2019). Open Science is for Aging Research, Too. Innovation in Aging, 3(4), igz028. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz028
Rios, J. A., Ihlenfeldt, S. D., Dosedel, M., & Riegelman, A. (2019). A Topical and Methodological Systematic Review of Meta‐Analyses Published in the Educational Measurement Literature. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, emip.12282. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12282
Bishop, D. V. M. (2019). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hnbex
Chin, J. M., Ribeiro, G., & Rairden, A. (2019). Open forensic science. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, lsz009. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsz009
Sarafoglou, A., Hoogeveen, S., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2019). Teaching Good Research Practices: Protocol of a Research Master Course. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 147572571985880. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719858807
Davis-Kean, P., & Ellis, A. (2019). An Overview of Issues in Infant and Developmental Research for the creation of Robust and Replicable Science [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/m4576
Branney, P., Reid, K., Frost, N., Coan, S., Mathieson, A., & Woolhouse, M. (2019). A context-consent meta-framework for designing open (qualitative) data studies. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16(3), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1605477
Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2019). Grassroots Training for Reproducible Science: A Consortium-Based Approach to the Empirical Dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 147572571985765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659
Weston, S. J., Ritchie, S. J., Rohrer, J. M., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019). Recommendations for Increasing the Transparency of Analysis of Preexisting Data Sets. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 251524591984868. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919848684
Epskamp, S. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in a Fast-Paced Methodological World. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 251524591984742. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847421
Ozier, O. (2019). Replication Redux : The Reproducibility Crisis and the Case of Deworming (No. WPS8835; pp. 1–43). The World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/118271556632669793/Replication-Redux-The-Reproducibility-Crisis-and-the-Case-of-Deworming
Hardwicke, T. E., Wallach, J., Kidwell, M., & Ioannidis, john. (2019). An empirical assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in the social sciences (2014-2017) [Preprint]. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/6uhg5
Schnack, H. (2019). Assessing reproducibility in association studies. ELife, 8, e46757. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46757
Aguinis, H., & Solarino, A. M. (2019). Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants. Strategic Management Journal, smj.3015. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3015
Penders, B., Holbrook, J. B., & de Rijcke, S. (2019). Rinse and repeat: the situated value of replication across epistemic cultures [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/nfjb6
L. Haven, T., & Van Grootel, Dr. L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147
Frank, M. C. (2019). Towards a more robust and replicable science of infant development. Infant Behavior and Development, 57, 101349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2019.101349
Nosek, B. A., Beck, E. D., Campbell, L., Flake, J. K., Hardwicke, T. E., Mellor, D. T., van ’t Veer, A. E., & Vazire, S. (2019). Preregistration Is Hard, And Worthwhile. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(10), 815–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.009
Eren, M. I., Bebber, M. R., Norris, J. D., Perrone, A., Rutkoski, A., Wilson, M., & Raghanti, M. A. (2019). Experimental replication shows knives manufactured from frozen human feces do not work. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 27, 102002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.102002
Chambers, C. (2019). What’s next for Registered Reports? Nature, 573(7773), 187–189. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02674-6
Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific Utopia III: Crowdsourcing Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 174569161985056. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561